Antes de la primera emisión, La Comisión Deontológica del Colgio de Picólogos de Cataluña estaba estudiando si los psicólogos que participan incumplen algún principio ético profesional ante la avalancha de quejas de sus colegiados.

Leí en algún lugar, como me imaginaba, que antes y después había “sesiones terapeúticas”y que la televisada era una de ellas, pero ahora no encuentro el enlace, cachiss.

esta entrevista con Ann Weiser Cornell, profesora de “Focusing” (muy alabado por Ken Wilber), donde habla de un experimento colectivo relacionado con esta cita del creador de esta elegante técnica

“Your physically felt body is, in fact, part of a gigantic system of here and other places, now and other times, you and other people, in fact the whole universe. This sense of being bodily alive in a vast system is the body as it is felt from inside.”
Eugene T. Gendlin, Founder of “Focusing.”

http://www.futureprimitive.org/interviews/124

Te mando también un extracto de una web que considero fascinante…el autor es físico, practica zen…y ha experimentado una serie de “experiencias”, que articula de forma fascinante… Conceptos-clave: recursión viviente, hiperconectividad, aprendizaje escalar

“The person I wish to speak to, is you. And what I want to speak about is our so-called ‘nature’, which, in simple terms, is a way of pointing toward what we are and do in reality (rather than merely in human models or concepts).

I hope that you may find the inspiration to go seeking your own nature in your own way, for this is really the only ‘approved’ way of experiencing it, or learning more about it. Who is this way ‘approved’ by?

By everyOneThingWhereWhen. Essentially, it’s approved by the reality in which we exist and of which we are transient expressions. This reality is neither a thing, nor a being. It is more a metaBeingThingWay. That is to say, it is more than a being, inclusive of all things, and is a way of emerging into and departing from existence which is ever-more-diverse in its modes of expression and disappearance. (There are, it turns out, some metaphors or comparators which our common experience lacks. Many of them are combinations of those we already possess. You will encounter a few such combinatory terms in this essay: do not be alarmed. They are not indications of insanity or megalomania on my part. They are instead invitations to experience uncommon perspectives on ‘what-ness’ (the underlying class of identity to which some referent belongs)).

As all of us are aware, there are many extant traditions and religions, philosophies, &c., which would like to dictate to us what we must be or do or think in order to fulfil some sort of obligation which we purportedly acquired during the process of becoming human. The basic idea promulgated by these organizations is that our birth resulted in some ostensible debt which we must repay under pain of (insert any of a number of hideous punishments or losses here).

There are others, slightly more palatable, which imply that certain delights or rewards will be ours if we will only (insert various catalogues of difficult practices, avoidances, or procedures here). These latter are certainly the more civilized of the two, but both of these modes of admonition are outright lies. The fact is this: reality exists entirely without books and traditions.

Reality and living beings were doing this long before our species arose to representational awareness, and both will continue to do so long after our species departs the stage. Beings of every possible kind experienced both their natures, and the fulfillment of those natures without the aid of experts, traditions, texts, or even concepts! Truth be told, most experiences of actual fulfillment have nothing whatsoever to do with human conceptual models about them. Even those reached through the vehicle of some tradition are well-known to explode forth with such incredible and irreducible novelty as to defy every possible explanation or map!

Given this fact, which any of you may verify with a small amount of personal research, one is left to wonder why all of these traditions exist, and what their actual functions are. The answers to those questions are probably worth the effort required to reveal them, however it is not a part of my current intention to explore those questions in detail. Let it then suffice to mention a few relatively obvious features of the answers: humans generally believe in conserving information across the boundary of generations, because we believe that the only information that survives the death of those possessing it must have been recorded in such a manner (i.e. as an object) as to render it available to future generations (i.e. oral traditions, writing, &c.).

Although I find this idea just as rationally compelling as most people do, I do not really believe it, because it is my experience that there are other modes of accessible records which exist with or without the recordings of human beings.”

(…) “Perhaps the single most urgent and important thing for us to realize is that Earth is a biocognitive unity — which, in simple terms, means that the sum of the experience of terrestrial life forms is a shared dimension.

Whatever is happening to any being here, is happening to all the beings here — and the complexity of the sum, is the complexity available to each individual — in a dimension we don’t yet believe in — simply because our sciences have not ‘discovered’ this dimension.

A long time ago, this dimension was called ’spirit’, which meant ‘the dimension in which all beings are connected’. The problem here on Earth is that the most complex creatures — humans — are extremely busy erasing the anciently conserved biocognitive complexity that surrounds us, and replacing it with mechanical and industrial momentums which torture and toxicify the entire terrestrial environment. Since this game of biocognition depends upon local and distributed complexity, health, and diversity the result of our activity is the erasure of the very source and basis of our own intelligence, and as this process proceeds — we are rendered less and less likely to be able to notice this effect.

We’re dumbifying the planet, and ourselves, by wiping out the complex animalian and vegetative biointelligence of our world. The more we erase, the less capable we are of noticing the results, because the results are inhibiting our relational intelligence in waves that magnify themselves exponentially.as the process proceeds. We cannot see what we’re doing for a simple reason: we don’t believe that there’s any connection between the health of the biosphere and our intelligence. Instead, we believe a fable — that intelligence is inherent to our persons or species.

It isn’t.

In fact, as anyone who even briefly examines this will see, human intelligence is a transmission game. The representational aspect is transmitted by contact with human cultures, and the inherent biocognitive aspect is transmitted by experiential immersion relations with living environments, as well as that invisible dimension we spoke of which connects all the life-forms of Earth in a web of co-emergent ‘likeness’.

The way Earth assembles intelligence is fundamentally relational, and our species rose to our seemingly-complex position in this game partly because in the genesis-phase of this rise, the biocomplex diversity of Earth and our experiential environments was explosively magnificent.

But something got mixed-up in our species, and very early on we began attacking the sources of our own relational intelligence: we made war against the animalian biosphere, and in so doing, we underwent a bizarre and systemic trauma where the damage we there inflicted was instantly reflected in ourselves, our activities, our potentials, and our cultures — just as it is today”.

http://www.organelle.org/organelle/soulever/soulever.htm

gracias por subir un enlace de mi blog a meneame,

seguimos en contacto

besos

Yo también tengo un punto de hurañez bastante elevado, jeje, así que no hay problema, ya llegará el momento que hagamos ese café… Buena propuesta la de hablar de este tema, esperaré con ganas a tu próximo post.

Un besazo!

Coincido con lo que dices, a mi también me recordó a “La Naranja Mecánica”.

Por cierto, tenemos un café pendiente, no me olvido. Pero soy la personificación de la “pereza social”. Sacarme de mi “hurañez” tiene tela. Mira, ahora que explico esto, pienso que quizá sería buena idea hacer un post sobre el tema. Airear el olor a rancio de lo huraño.

Que también para ti sea un lindo año.

En cuanto a lo de la caja roja, buffff, me he quedado un poco pasmada, aunque podemos esperar cualquier cosa de según que tipo de televisión, también hay que tener en cuenta que el que vaya a ese programa, en teoría debería de estar perfectamente informado de lo que puede suceder … a mí me recuerda un poco a “La Naranja Mecánica”

Te mando un beso y que tengas un muy feliz año!!